Share product ideas and upvotes with our product team
Currently we have follow up’s made using a workflow and find creates the follow up. We would like to be able to show the user that sent the last message as the one sending the follow up rather than Fin to make it more personalized. We are not seeing a good response to those follow ups and does look like users are disregarding the follow ups knowing that it is a bot.We think keeping it personalized and showing the user as the one sending the follow up will engage users more.
I’d like to be able to filter my content suggestions by the team inbox it’s pulled the suggestion from. This is especially helpful for us, since we encounter very different types of enquiries, which we’d like to review separately. /automation/fin-ai-agent/content-suggestions
Our CS staff all have the right hand panel personalised to view different information. I’d like to set one as a default for new members joining the team to ensure they have all the same information visible and in a similar order. It could be helpful also if we could create custom groups of attributes for the right column, not only the default ones, for example:If I wanted to create a group of User attributes, company attributes and Qualification all in one
The Related Articles presented in an article page are automatically assigned. The association is not great, and I want to have an option to remove and add articles to this list manually if needed.
Problem to Solve:We use several workflows for things that are based on dates - holidays and all company meetings are two big examples. Currently workflows have to be set live and paused manually, which is a big headache, especially when we’re off on holidays. Examples:Phone Workflows for Holidays - We have to pause our standard workflow where the voicemail messaging is set to our standard VM and then set the holiday one live where it has different messaging outlining verbiage for the holiday. Automated Response (Customer Sends Any Message) - We have to do the same thing for our standard auto-response for chats that says when we’re out of office and pause that for the holiday, then set the one live that has the holiday messaging. Those are just two examples, but there are several use cases of how this would come in handy and make things much more efficient. Suggestion:Similar to the Proactive Support Settings, add the option for when to start sending and stop sending, with both the date and time options:
hello, have an idea to create trigger which will be triggered in workflow based on office hours(time condition) and based on agents status- as example new status away and unassign. We are working in 2 shifts and we want to stop tickets solution when one shift is finished tickets should be reassigned.And i think that so advanced AI based platform it should be done based on triggers not manually.
For the user’s view - Would it be possible to add timestamps to the individual messages in the support chat?
In the new Responsiveness report, we are losing a really great table called “First Response Time Breakdown.”This is a great tool my team uses to track and set goals on getting customers first responses in certain time intervals. And we’ve used this particular table over the years to do that. With the new reports, we don’t have a way to segment by these time intervals. So we’d need a new “Segment by” field that would be something like “First Response Window,” which would segment our first response time data, by these time intervals. I would hate to see the legacy report fully go without getting this same report in the new or custom reporting tools. Thanks intercom team!
Hi There,Can I offer something to take Finn to the next level, and really get your cusotmers excited!I think voice command must be the future of live-chat. If the Finn widget could include the option to offer a ‘Voice’ response as an option. For example the visitor could tap a speaker button to ask question by voice, and get audio responses.For example, you could use an integration with https://elevenlabs.io/app/speech-synthesis/text-to-speech to give Intercom customer the option to set up ‘Cloned Voice’Then you could even offer website visitors the opportunity to converse with the voice of the Founder, or creator of the companies products, who could talk virtually with customers just as if they were talking directly to the real person.I feel this could really help conversion on your customers websites, as trust and customer service is everything, and this could potentially increase your overall business. Here’s hoping!CheersBrett
I would love to see an option on the Details screen that would allow someone with a certain group profile setting flag a conversation as “Needs Coaching” or “Quality Review” or something to that effect (customizable based on the needs). This could be something that would not be visible to the front-line reps. The situational usage of this would be if someone who is not the direct manager of a front-line rep reviews a conversation and has a concern (for instance a Vendor Manager or QPM see a conversation handled by a BPO partner and want to make sure leadership at the BPO or the QA team there are alerted), they could check a box, add a note and the team would get an alert, but the front-line rep would not see this. @Gerald Prado @Arlene Trompczynski
I would love to see an enhancement added that allows notifications to be created (defined via a workflow) when certain tags are used on a conversation. For instance, if a convo is tagged as “Abusive Customer” it could alert a certain Ops team for review, if it is tagged as “Outstanding Response” it could alert the Quality team, or another tag could just specifically alert an individual person. @Gerald Prado
Hi, I would like to suggest allowing custom audio alerts/notifications on intercom. Currently I feel only one of the options is loud enough to suitably grab my attention but it also happens to be quite piercing of a sound. Would love it if we could supply our own audio files to be used or just a wider selection of alerts. Thank you
Currently, the localization of the messenger UI is determined only by device settings, such as the browser language. However, user language preferences do not always match these settings, leading to a less personalized experience. It would be valuable to implement an option to set dynamic localization rules for the messenger UI. For instance, the UI could adapt based on the language tag in the URL, rather than defaulting to the browser language or relying on a static language override. At the moment, I am unable to find an appropriate solution to trigger acceptable UI translations for visitors. The existing language override feature only allows setting the UI to a single language, without the option for dynamic adjustments. For example, while my devices are set to English, I’d prefer the messenger UI to reflect the language of the help center page I’m visiting, ensuring personalized user experience.
Being able to organise templates in folders to enhance usability is a key feature. We are implementing Intercom and will have close to 100 templates when finished. The proposed work around with naming and searching is not really sufficient and it becomes a trial and error to see if you have selected the correct template. Please implement this feature. Thank you!
We regularly have contacts who reach out to our support team via email from different addresses. They might contact us from their work email, personal email, and an alias email (bsmith@email.com vs bobsmith@email.com). In all of these cases, we want to link the email lead to the actual user by merging the contact and adding one of the newly identified email addresses as a secondary email address for that contact. Front, Zendesk, and Help Scout all offer this as basic functionality. Without this ability to maintain multiple email addresses for a single contact, we have multiple threads going in various locations without our awareness. Likewise, it’s a challenge to keep our customer in-app data in view when the other email addresses are treated as leads rather than linkable to the primary user contact.
The idea is the next: it would be perfect, if metrics for Fin Copilot would be adjustable to more filters, to be precise to channels.
Hey! We’d like to exclude ‘First response time’ target for Outbound (non-started by customer) tickets.Since Outbound tickets originate from our side, 'First Response Time' is irrelevant and often breached, which impacts our SLA accuracy.Our goal is to maintain SLA tracking for customer responses in Outbound tickets while excluding 'First Response Time' from the metrics, ensuring reports remain meaningful.Thanks!!
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.