Product Wishlist | Community
Skip to main content

    Idea Pipeline

    Filter by idea status

    Browse by category

    2568 Ideas

    Apptrove MMPNew Participant

    Ability to Add No Index Tag to individual help centre ArticlesSubmitted

     Feature Request: Per-Article Search Engine Indexing Control for Help Center ArticlesI would like the ability to control search engine indexing at an individual article level within the Intercom Help Center.Current ProblemOur organization has knowledge base content published both on our main company website and in the Intercom Help Center. Some articles have similar or identical titles/content.Currently, Intercom only provides these options: Disable indexing for the entire Help Center. Make articles Unlisted, which removes them from Help Center navigation and search, remains only accessible through direct link. None of these meet our requirement.Desired FunctionalityWe need a per-article setting (for example, a toggle in the article editor or details panel) that allows:✅ Article remains: Publicly accessible via Help Center URL Visible in Help Center navigation Searchable within Help Center search for all visitors ✅ But: Not indexed by external search engines like Google/Bing Does not appear in public search results Search engines receive a noindex directive for that specific article Suggested ImplementationAdd an article-level SEO setting such as:Search Engine Visibility☑ Allow search engines to index this article☐ Prevent search engines from indexing this article (meta robots="noindex")This could be added in the article Details or SEO Settings section.Use CaseWe want our primary website content to rank on Google while still keeping duplicate/support content fully discoverable inside the Intercom Help Center for customers.This feature would help avoid duplicate content SEO conflicts without impacting the Help Center user experience.This version should work well for Intercom’s Product Wishlist submission.

    Trevor
    Innovator ✨
    TrevorInnovator ✨

    Fin Ai Agent Access to Tracker Tickets for SMART bug Categorization, handling, and communicationSubmitted

    The Problem:We have bugs that arise, just like any other tech company. We’re constantly innovating and pushing updates, and therefore encounter unexpected issues. We typically fix widespread issues and outages very quickly. And we link all customers to a tracker ticket. Fin spends way too much time blindly leading a customer through troubleshooting steps, when there’s a deeper issue Fin is unaware of. How we solve today:It takes a lot of effort to create a snippet, and create guidance for the snippet, to quickly train Fin on a known issue. And then that guidance and snippet has to be manually deleted hours or days later when the issue is resolved. It’s constantly evolving, requiring multiple steps. We create tracker tickets to inform customers and human agents of the progress of issues like this. So I’m training my agents and Fin separately, in two different places. The Dream Scenario: Awareness: Fin is aware of all active Tracker Tickets logged by human agents. Mitigation: Fin automatically offers a workaround to the customer if one is documented. Proactive Subscription: Fin asks the customer if they would like to be notified of updates regarding the bug. Automation: Upon confirmation, Fin automatically links the conversation to the Tracker Ticket and converts the conversation into a customer ticket. Persistence: Fin remains the primary point of contact unless the issue requires human escalation. Resolution Loop: When the Tracker Ticket is marked "Resolved," Fin proactively follows up with the customer to confirm the fix is working for them. Proposed Implementation in IntercomTracker Ticket Settings Add a "Sync to Fin AI" toggle on Tracker Tickets (or enable this by default for specific Ticket Types). When enabled, provide specific AI-optimized fields: Symptoms: Describe what a customer would experience (to help Fin match the issue). Workarounds: Step-by-step instructions for Fin to provide. Target Audience: Specific conditions or user segments impacted. Auto-Link: Toggle option to allow Fin to automatically link users to a Tracker Ticket. Auto-Ticket Creation: Toggle option for Fin to generate a linked conversation ticket automatically upon bug identification.

    JHarlowe
    JHarloweConnector

    Attribute mapping on conversation-to-ticket conversionSubmitted

    Problem:When a conversation is converted to a ticket, attribute values on the conversation are not automatically populated into matching ticket fields, even when identically named fields exist on both objects. The two remain linked but maintain fully independent attribute sets.This gap is not surfaced to users at the point of conversion, making it non-obvious until a workflow fails or an SLA is missed. ImpactThe most immediate consequence is SLA policy behavior. Because SLA policies in Intercom evaluate at the conversation level, a ticket with Urgency set on the ticket attribute, but not on the corresponding conversation attribute may not trigger or breach correctly. Teams populating ticket fields in good faith could be inadvertently creating invisible SLA gaps. Additionally, any workflow conditioned on a ticket attribute will not fire as expected if that attribute was not populated at conversion time. This affects routing logic, automation triggers, and any Fin-based attribute detection, which does not carry over to tickets automatically.Requested FeatureA native attribute mapping configuration allowing workspace admins to define field-level mappings between conversation attributes and ticket attributes. When a conversion occurs, values from mapped source fields would be written into their designated target fields automatically before any workflows evaluate the new ticket.