Share product ideas and upvotes with our product team
Current Limitation:At the moment, technicians can only be logged into the following routing channels: Phone (Phone only) Conversations (Includes both Chat and Email) Suggestion for Improvement:I’d like to propose greater flexibility in how routing channels are configured and assigned. Specifically: Split Email from the Conversations Channel: Allow Email to be its own standalone routing channel, separate from Chat. This would enable technicians to be logged into Email without being required to handle Chat at the same time. Enable Multi-Channel Selection: Provide the option for technicians to select multiple channels—rather than being limited to just one or "All." For example, a tech could be logged into both Phone and Email, but not Chat. Alternative Approach:If separating Email from Conversations isn’t feasible, another solution would be to include Email as part of the Phone channel. This way, Phone agents could assist with email volume during slower phone periods.Why This Matters:In environments where email and chat volumes are particularly high, the current setup disproportionately burdens the “Conversation” techs while “Phone” techs remain limited in how they can help. This often requires manual intervention by team leads to balance workloads across the team. By allowing more flexible channel selection or smarter routing, teams could improve efficiency and reduce operational overhead.
I would like there to be an option for calls coming in to be forwarded to agents’ phones if they would like.
When a user sends an email and has an attached file, for example a generated log, I’d love to be able to use that to branch workflows. e.g. when asking a user to reply with a file, and they reply without a file, or incorrect file extension - be able to reply with what we’re missing
Hi Intercom team,I’d like to submit a feature request regarding the recipient field within conversations. Specifically, we’re looking for a way to remove or disable the automatic population of the recipient field, requiring agents to manually input the recipient email address before sending or closing a conversation.The goal is to prevent messages from being sent to incorrect or outdated emails that Fin automatically pulls up, ensuring accuracy and reducing the risk of miscommunication. Ideally, the system would not allow the conversation to be sent or closed until the email field is correctly and intentionally filled in by the user.Thank you for considering this!
Problem to Solve:The AI Generated CSAT reports are AMAZING, and there’s so much information, but it is a little cumbersome to get an understanding of the overall reason the AI generated score was given without digging into each of the individual conversations. Request: Would be great to be able to add a AI Generated Summary to the report that gives a combined overview of why it provided the score that it did. 🎥 Video ExplanationAmazon Example:
In the beta testing area of Fin, I’d like to be able to point it to specific article when it provides the wrong answer or content. Sometimes it pulls similar content but is the wrong answer and the only option is to change the article or add a snippet. I want to be able to point it to the correct article rather than right a snippet or change the article it chose to use.
Problem to Solve:When an onboarding task is complete, there’s no way to set a rule that it marks that individual task complete for the entire company. You can create a rule to mark an entire checklist as complete across the company, but not a specific task within a checklist. Example:When one of our Vet customers has finished adding Inventory items, they want to be able to mark that particular step within a larger checklist complete so that other people within the organization know that there’s nothing more that needs to be done with that individual task. That’s just one example, but we have many along those some lines. Proposed Solution: Add a toggle that allows that particular step to be resolved for the entire company.
In our (intercom) help centre we reference customers to submit a ticket for certain problems that we know we will always require a ticket for.However we cannot link customers to submit a ticket within intercoms help centre. Either by using a link to open a ticket in the messenger or embedding a ticket form within the help centre article itself. There is no way to get a customer to the ticket we want from an article!I know this is possible using code to Trigger from HTML on your own webpageThere is also a nice way to add tickets to the messenger homeBut these do not solve the issue of customer on a help centre article have no next step to submit a ticket and must now start a live chat to get to a ticket!We have found a workaround (that is not easily scalable for many tickets) to this where by using workflows and “When customer clicks a website element” trigger we are able to link a specific button or text within the help centre to then open a ticket in the messenger.Ideally we would eitherbe able to use a set URL to create links to tickets in the help centre so we can link any elements we want eg:https://www.yourhelpcentrecustomdomain/showticket/{ticket_ID) have a function built into the help centre button or another option to link a ticket.In both cases I think these would then open the messenger to the ticket id allowing the customer to complete and submit the ticket quickly from within the help centre
If a ticket contains multiple screenshots / images / documents, it would be really nice to be able to quickly navigate through them in the quickview modus - meaning it would be nice to click on a right-arrow for example to easily open the next attached image (or a left-arrow to go back).
Hi Team,We want to push daily tickets/conversations count reports to Slack channel for specific regions.The region value is exist in the customer/user attributes, but currently even via API it’s not possible to search tickets based on the custom attributes.Please consider. Thank you.
Goal:Ability to easily add the conversation flow that is included on the “Overview” report, within custom reports.Justification: This is great visual tool to have, especially when reporting metrics up to the Executives, but it’s extremely cumbersome for companies that have multiple products and/or have a ton of filters they need to include when looking at the metrics.Right now we don’t leverage it at all because it takes too much time to keep adding and removing filters for 9 products, in combination with the multiple departments within those products that we’re trying to evaluate (Support, Onboarding, Success, Sales).Example:
When setting up tags, I’d really like the ability to toggle on requiring tags in order to close a conversation. I saw this conversation from a few years ago that asked for something similar:However, as mentioned in that convo above, setting up a keyword-based auto-tagging system would be quite a lift for us, considering ever-changing tags + trying to ensure we got all relevant keywords to trigger the auto-tagging workflow. That, versus having a simple toggle to require the team to tag each conversation with the most relevant tag. I really just want that ability so we can have more robust data by having ALL conversations tagged 😅
This has been raised before, but the answer has always been to enable auto-tagging, we don’t find this to be completely reliable. We align part of our dev effort based on what causes us the most support issues, and have found auto-tagging often misses (context from customers is often sadly lacking!) the key issue or system area. Would like an option to force manual tagging of conversations/tickets prior to allowing a closure.
I find it odd that we can create different help centers and brand but we are limited to only one messenger, where we cannot change the tabs displayed but only change the style (colors)
Description:Currently, we have the ability to A/B test proactive messages within the messenger, which is valuable for optimizing message content and timing. However, there is no functionality to A/B test different versions of the messenger itself (e.g., style, layout, tone, or content blocks).Proposed Enhancement:Introduce the ability to A/B test different messenger variants — not just the messages — to evaluate the impact of design, copy, or promotional elements on user engagement and click-through rates. This would enable more robust experimentation, such as testing: Different welcome messages or layouts for various promotions Variations in design or visual emphasis Different tones (e.g., conversational vs. professional)
There is a long list of options for social links in Outbound, with icons that can be linked and set up in a row. However, Bluesky is missing. We’ve recently moved to Bluesky (from X) and would like to have this option.
I would like to get more insight into how often our readers are successfully searching for content at a knowledge base level.Request to add some additional knowledge base search analytics:Total # searches # successful searches (success = search returned at least one result) # no result found searches (no result found = searches that did not produce any results) # of bounced searches (search returned a result but user did not click on any of the results).
I would love to have a function where we can trigger a workflow with specific set conditions, but able to search for conversations in the current backlog. This way you can use the workflow after an incident, when the conversation or user/lead of the conversation matches XYZ conditions, respond on the conversations following this workflow.
Hello all,Submitting a feature request for consideration: Can Intercom implement a functionality where, if an agent misses a call, their status automatically changes to “Away” instead of defaulting back to “Available”?This can help ensure the targeting coaching —addressing missed calls as availability issues rather than repeatedly coaching agents on missed calls that may simply be a result of not being at their workstation.Thank you!
I’ve had a few use cases where we’d like to use tooltips to label a feature in our product as new, or use a different label/icon to draw attention to a feature, but don’t need or want any popup text to trigger on click or hover. Right now it seems that you can’t save a tooltip without content.Just wanted to submit this idea in case others would find that helpful!
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.