Share product ideas and upvotes with our product team
At my organization, our support reps do several tasks when they are not active on live conversations or responding to emails. It would be great to have the ability to add custom away reasons within Intercom. For example, our support reps are commonly reviewing social media posts as a part of their daily tasks, so if we could add this as a custom away reason, then it would give us more insight into what our support reps are doing throughout a given day and how much time they are spending on respective tasks. Ideally, admins would be able to add custom away reasons on the backend that would then appear as available options for reps when changing their away reason or status.
I don’t mind product placement in a free tier. You get what you pay for, that is fine. But we pay a substantial fee to have “powered by Intercom” under every email sent out by support. That is not professional looking and I’d like to be able to turn that off.This is injected currently as part of our auto response.
Summary: I would like a tester feature added to workflows, to test how/when certain rules will trigger. Similar to the code testing for integrationsContext: I spend a good amount of time building workflows. And one of the bug bares is creating a number of rules of how, when and who this workflow apply to, only for these not to work in unique use cases. Problem: Currently, to know exactly how the rules (e.g. audience rules) work is mostly trial and error, especially when multiple attributes are needed. Through experience, I do avoid the majority of issues, and with the help from Intercom’s Fin and support team I can troubleshoot issues. But this takes a lot of time, and for things to go wrong, for this to happen.Suggestion: When creating rules e.g. for audience, branches etc. there should be a testing box. Similar to the Preview option, and the “Test response” are when creating new integrations/data connectors. Where you can provide a scenario or user profile to confirm whether the rules will trigger or not.
We’ve noticed some issues regarding multichannel availability and would love to see some additional options or the ability to customize. These availability options would be nice, but ultimately I think the ability to customize based on our needs would be ideal: chats, phones, conversations, and like a callbacks option.
We would like to create guidance the can reference specific folders that we have set up for snippets. For instance, “if a client is asking about forms, first ask them which type of form they are using. If they say they are using a X form, only respond based on snippets from the X folder and if they respond with Y form, only respond with snippets from Y folder.”Same idea as well with Knowledge content, if we could use Guidance to have it only source articles from a specific section (church management, Giving, apps, etc) that could really help.
Can you add an option to the conversation messages to show newest on top instead of the current message showing newest at the bottom
Search includes message content but not attachments. Makes it quite hard to find an attachment if you know the file name but not the sender or date. Please index attachment file names for global search.
It would be incredibly beneficial to add the ability to select a default company for Customers when they have access to multiple companies and they open a new conversation/ticket. For example, If Customer 1 has access to Companies A, B and C. They are an employee of Company A, which is the “Parent” company of Companies B and C. We would like to be able to have it set so that when this user creates a conversation, it defaults to Company A rather than having to search through the list of companies they have access to to select this every time. The reason for this is because we have some customers that have access to 20+ companies. Having a default option for this would be amazing.
The removal of the Three Dots to view a historic thread is very inconvenient. The vast majority of our tickets are forwarded in from other members of staff, or clients themselves. Forwarding content to us is a massive part in our everyday work, so not being able to view the full thread as normal has a huge impact on us.The only option now is to view the Raw Email, which isn’t the same and is not a good solution. Reading an email in HTML format is not user-friendly, nor has it saved us any time. It removes attachments which, again, is causing huge problems.Please reinstate the Three Dots.
We’re able to view Wrap-Up Time per conversation in the dashboard, but we don’t have a way to see this summarized or aggregated at the agent or team level. It would be incredibly helpful to have a reportable metric that reflects total and average Wrap-Up Time for agents.
With the introduction of BCC to Emails, would really enjoy the ability to choose where Participants should be listed under the “Manage Participants” Section. Maybe like a Tab View to rotate over on who is listed under TO, CC, & BCC. With the BCC offering a quick add of myself “Quick Add YOU as BCC” (this concept is the idea of following the ticket).
Currently, the private apps in the developer hub show the date of the last installation or token regeneration.This is not very useful to identify whether that private app is still actively used or whether we have valid API credentials that are not needed anymore.To be able to safely delete unused private apps without the risk of breaking some usages, it would be great to have an info about the last time the token of the app was used to access the API.
We are developing a product that is highly configurable, so most of our URLs involve some id placeholders.The current URL matching capabilities of outbound message triggers or product tours make it quite hard to target our pages. We have to create multiple “contains” criteria for the various static parts of the URLs, still hoping that it does not match extra pages having those static parts in a different place.It would be great to support targeting URL patterns instead, to make this case easier.
Intercom have advised that there is no way to see the AI response and edit it before sending to a customer.We respond to complex questions, so we want to improve AI’s reponses, we can’t be the only company who wants a choice imbetween the one to not use AI and let it send messages to customer without review.
I would like the option to copy data connectors. This will save me time.
Hello,Can there be an easier way to view all tags associated to the conversation from within the conversation view? It would be nice if on the Details side bar there was a section for tags and you could easily remove or edit them.Currently if I am reviewing a case and want to see what tags are associated I have to look for the tags in various sections or read the conversation events in hopes of not missing them.Additionally, when my team gets a case transferred to them from another team, they may want to remove a tag which means they have to do the same review as above and hope they don’t miss something.It would be great to have one spot to view this and easy click to remove a tag if necessary.Thanks for your consideration.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.