Share product ideas and upvotes with our product team
Currently, the beep at the beginning of the call is aggressive and gives the impression that the call is not going to succeed. A long-awaited improvement on our side is direct routing to the IVR to avoid confusion.
To have an IVR dashboard for the advanced licenses tier to monitor in real-time if we have calls waiting/people logged into the phone queues. This would make life so much easier at this time or allow us to add an extra charge per person to get access to the dashboards.
Current Situation:At the moment, customers can select a category for their inquiries in the Intercom Messenger, which works well for directing questions to the appropriate teams. However, for customer inquiries submitted via email, this categorization process doesn't work, causing all emails to be assigned to a single team by default. This creates extra manual work to redirect these inquiries to the correct team.Proposed Solution:We would like to leverage AI to analyze the content of customer questions and automatically assign them to the most relevant team, regardless of the channel through which the inquiry is submitted (Messenger or email).How it Would Work: AI-Based Content Analysis: The AI would analyze the text of each customer inquiry and match it with the most relevant team based on the content of the message. Team Descriptions: For the AI to function effectively, each team within our organization would have a detailed description of the types of inquiries they handle. These descriptions would be used by the AI to make accurate assignments. Cross-Channel Implementation: This solution should apply to all channels, including both Messenger and email, ensuring that inquiries are routed efficiently without requiring customers to manually categorize their questions. Reduced Customer Effort: This removes the need for customers to select a category or specify a team, allowing them to simply ask their question. The AI takes over the categorization process, resulting in a more seamless experience.
When a messenger call with screenshare is recorded, the resolution is 320x140px making the screen text unreadable and the recording useless.
As a report user in Intercom and manager, I would like to be able to use different Aggregation types (like in Responsiveness report - Average, Maximum, Minimum in addition to Median) in all reports. We use Average in our data analysis a lot, as we find it a better measure for most cases.
Reporting got recently updated and it looks great, yet one of my favorite reports got deprecated. The Fin AI Agent dashboard still has the old report.The new report only shows a number and the drill-down provides a lot of columns with not a lot of functionality. There are IDs with links provided, but it’s not possible to click through on the user or the company. Being able to see the ‘Remarks from customers’ with the User, rating, teammate and remark enabled us to praise teammates or to sit down and assess the situation. It also gave a quick overview of the general feeling for the last customers that left remarks (positive or negative). With the new reporting, we would need to create 2 reports (one negative, one positive) and drill down on each to see the remarks.
Sending a moderately long reply to a conversation/ticket provides a poor experience. The larger your reply, the less of the conversation thread you can actually see. There’s no way to stretch the box to make it wider/shorter/longer. If you need to reference a message in the thread, you have to actually use Notes or a separate doc to formulate the reply, and then only c&p to the Intercom inbox when ready.The two arrows in the top left allow for very minimal reduction in the size of the Description box, but not enough to make any difference. It’s impossible to resize images so some paste enormously while others paste very small. The inbox thread/reply area should allow agents to stretch and scroll to accommodate short and long answers.
Add the ability in the Spam inbox for us to delete spam messages once we have verified they are spam.
Suggestion to add domain matching to auto-match a user to a company based on the company domain. This can be an optional toggle. When Company A has an email domain (@test.com) set, and a user from Company A (user@test.com) logs into the platform and a user is created in Intercom, they should to automatically get associated with Company A.
The Messenger view for Conversations and Tickets is broken when our customers have more than a couple of Conversations or Tickets. We are using Intercom to communicate with clients on an ongoing basis over a number of years, and some of our customers have raised hundreds of support tickets over their lifetime. One Customer I reviewed today has 422 Conversations and Tickets.It is not suitable for the Customer to scroll through 422 Converstions and Tickets in the Messenger window that takes up 15% of their screen.Intercom has build a ticket portal, but this is only available for Companies, not individual Customers. None of our Customers are associated with Companies. We are imminently planning to build our own Converstion and Ticket Portal using the Intercom API, but it would be much lower effort if Intercom extended their existing portal to be used by individual Customers not part of a Company.
Hello, Not all companies selling products which give users some sort of access with login page. Due to that thous companies have limitation of using tickets portal or authorize users in messenger.issue a lot of leads no correct structure in contacts.Intercom can make some sort of login option prom messenger with ability create login to self service platform to ticketing platform directly from messenger window
Would be lovely, if we could set it up, so a ticket changes state automatically to ‘In process’, if it is already in a ‘Submitted’ state - or enable it via a Workflow to whichever state is desirable.
It’s great that Intercom filters out SPAM automatically, but I wish there would be more flexibility to control what’s SPAM and what’s not from the side of Intercom clients as well. We have clients that are being constantly recognized as SPAM even after several time marking their emails as “Not SPAM” - this is creating super huge inconvenience.So now we have to choose between raising threshold for spam, so that client’s email will go through to inbox, that may lead to actual spam reaching the inbox OR keeping the threshold as it is and constantly checking SPAM folder.
Today, the default Tickets report can be filtered by ticket type. For an overview of Tickets metrics, there should be a chart on the default Tickets report that reports ticket type data. Could be as simple as a bar graph indicating ticket type and volume for each ticket type. This seems a lot more intuitive and high-level than filtering the entire ticket report by a single ticket type.
Allow control over inboxes so that if I have assigned a team and a teammate to a conversation in help desk, it will show in both the teams inbox and the teammates inbox. An example of this is if we have individual customer support team members A, B and C who provide coverage for our software at different points in time based on time zones and then a development team who also operate on different time zones. If a user reports a bug, I want to be able to assign the conversation to a team but also keep myself as customer support team member "A" also assigned to the conversation so that both customer support and the development team can easily access the conversation. Currently the system will hide from the team once a teammate is assigned. I believe this is somewhat already possible with the views feature but requires multiple views to be set up for each combination of customer support + dev team. (Would require 3 “views” for each combination of A + dev team, B + dev team, C + dev team).
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.