Share product ideas and upvotes with our product team
We are only using conversations in Intercom, not tickets. Currently, the “Jira for Tickets” app maintained by intercom does not support linking Jira tickets to Intercom conversations, only Intercom tickets. A message saying “ Jira for Tickets app only works within a context of a ticket.” is displayed. I see no reason for not being able to link conversations. I can’t switch to tickets and don’t want to create tracking tickets just for this purpose. We are trying to reduce the required administration overhead, not increase it. Thank you!
Automatically receiving alerts for failed API calls would save time and eliminate the need for manual log checks.
Team members can setup a calendar link on our individual profiles - however we cannot use those links in the email signature templates. Seems like a useful addition to the product - any plans for this?
Hi ! We’d love to have native functionality that allows us to identify and rank our top users based on the number of conversations they’ve had with our support team over a given time period (weekly, monthly, quarterly, custom range).This would help us: Spot high-contact users and accounts who may need proactive support, onboarding, or tailored success initiatives. Identify potential product issues or blockers that generate repeated contact. Cross-reference with CSAT and resolution time to monitor satisfaction vs. workload. Refine our segmentation strategies and support prioritization efforts. Feature expectations: Sortable and exportable list of users (or accounts) by number of conversations. Filter by time range, inbox, team, tag, conversation status. Ability to view trends (e.g., rising volume) per user over time. Possibility to group by company/account (ideal for B2B). Let me know if this is something already on your roadmap — we believe it could be a game-changer for CX and Support Ops teams trying to be more data-driven!Best,
It would be extremely helpful to have better change tracking across the workspace. For instance, if I add a new conversation attribute, I’d like to see that it was added by me, and when. Right now, with multiple people editing things, it becomes chaotic — especially when we don’t know who made a change or when it happened.
Feature Request: Translation Feature Improvement – Preview Before Send & Multilingual Reply Support for Agents Description:We’d like to request enhancements to Intercom’s automatic translation feature to improve the agent experience and reduce translation-related issues when handling non-English conversations.Current Limitation: Agents cannot preview how their English response will be translated into the client’s language before sending it. Agents who are fluent in the client’s language (e.g., Dutch, French, Portuguese, Norwegian etc) are forced to reply in English, as direct replies in the client’s language are either discouraged or overwritten by the translation tool. This limits flexibility and increases the risk of tone or meaning being lost in translation. Proposed Enhancements: Translation Preview Before Sending: Allow agents to see a real-time preview of how their message will be translated before clicking “Send.” Multilingual Reply Option: Provide an option for agents to respond directly in the client’s language without triggering auto-translation — ideal for agents with the appropriate language skills. These improvements would give multilingual agents more control, reduce translation errors, and improve the overall quality and tone of client communication.Business Impact: Reduces risk of miscommunication in client interactions. Increases confidence among multilingual agents. Improves customer experience, especially in regulated or sensitive communication. Please let us know if this is feasible and whether it's already on the roadmap.
When deals are created through Intercom, the assignee of the activity in Pipedrive will always be the person who originally installed the Pipedrive app in your workspace. This issue could be resolved if there were an option to configure sales reps within the Pipedrive app, allowing you to select the appropriate sales rep to assign the deal to when it's created.
Hi, It would be really useful to be able to have at least two valid access token at the same time for an app in a workspace. This would make rotating access token way easier, because we could:add a new access token update our app with to use the new access token delete the no longer used access tokenCurrently this is not possible, so to rotate an access token we have to:regenerate the access token, but this make the previous one invalid so our app can no longer send event to intercom quickly update our app to use the new access token, but as it can take some time there will be data loss in the meantime
I cannot for the life of me figure out how to get more than 1 line aligned with the wrap text option for images.
Conversation topics is a really handy feature allowing us to set it up on an adhoc basis a review conversations that relate to the topic. I also love the fact that is bring the histoy as well, which makes it perfect for the scenario of an adhoc reporting request where we may have not already been collecting data on it and can set this up qucikly without a lot of manual effort. However, I’ve noticed that it is not applied to Tickets, the topic is only at the conversation level. So it would be great to be able to create reports for conversation topics and utilize it for both conversations and tickets.
Hi everyone! We were recently reviewing our Intercom workflows with Fin and noticed a couple of things that could improve the overall experience, both for our users and our support team. So here I am with some feature requests :) Make the 4-minute inactivity timer adjustable – In many cases, 4 minutes isn’t enough for users to check proposed solutions. It can make them feel rushed or like we’re trying to close the conversation too quickly. Having control over this timer would help us better match the user’s workflow. Customize the “Was that helpful?” message (timing + copy) – Sometimes this question appears after every reply, which feels robotic and breaks the flow (and doesn’t help the conversation with the bot feel “more human”). We’d love to control how often it shows up and adjust the message to better fit our tone and conversation style.
We’d love for our contacts to be able to get SMS notifications when a teammate responds to their message in the Messenger. Currently it’s only possible to do these notifications via email, but many of our contacts don’t really use email or don’t want to provide their email address (we are a little unique because we only have leads, no users). There is a simple automation that can trigger SMS notification, but all our interactions are governed by workflows, so we can’t use simple automations. Privacy considerations prevent us from having actual conversations over SMS, so having SMS notifications that point to the Messenger conversation would be ideal, allowing us to reach people who prefer SMS while maintaining privacy.
Enable some form of security copy for Articles (or Help Center) without API
Currently in the tickets portal, in the ‘Type’ filter, the customer can see the names of all ticket types from our workspace. We have created a number of types for our processes, the name of which depends, among other things, on the TIER level of our clients or is specific to the tasks of a particular client.For obvious reasons, we would like to avoid a situation where different customers see all the names. On top of that, there are test names that should never see the light of day ;) The issue also applies to those type names that have already been deleted/archived. I am able to imagine a case in which one can speak here of a breach of confidentiality in customer relations.In summary - only those type names that have been used for a given company name should appear in the filter in the tickets portal.
While the automatic away feature is great, it applies to the entire workspace teams. Rationale for this. We have team functions that is not important to have this automatic away. Having the ability to assign teams to have automatic away would help in our workflow.
Is there a way to stop sharing data between domains.For example, we want to show workflows to visitors/leads on our public facing site. However, when someone visits our public facing site (www.example.com) as a visitor, they’ll see a workflow targeted for that domain.Then if they click on LOG IN button and logs into the customer portal on subdomain (subdomain.example.com) then they’d continue seeing the workflow chatbot popup in customer portal too.Though we don’t want the customers to see the workflow that was specifically targeted for the public facing site.This frustrates the customers as they just want to go about their business with using the product.I have seen so many people in community forum facing the same issue but still no solution in sight. Even the Intercom (shutdown) is also not expected solution here.
Currently when testing new guidance with Fin we can only test how it will react in web chat. In the Preview/Test environment we’re unable to select which incoming channel the communication would be coming through. More specifically we would like to test SMS interactions to tailor the guidance for how customers will engage with Fin over SMS while keeping in mind things like character limits, linking references, surveying, and timing delays for large messages. Currently the only settings are for changing the user type, brands, and language.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.